@AbbieNormal Hadn't read it, thanks. I would like to reply to this issue in general (and reference this post) if I can find the time...
@AbbieNormal @cwebber The "natural persons" idea might have legs. Something like:
"This license applies only to natural persons. Other organizations should negotiate a separate license agreement"
Or maybe there could be a non-commercial criteria. This would have some blowback for small businesses shipping FOSS laptops or SBCs, etc, so perhaps its not a good solution.
Also Free Software isn't primarily supposed to be about the interests of developers. It's supposed to be about people's right to access public information. Libraries don't usually say that ICE employees can't borrow books (some might though) or that corporate borrowers must pay individual librarians.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!